Views put to the test.<\/span><\/h2><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>Open Data as an attitude.<\/span><\/h3><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>The debate about Open Data is initially less about technical issues and more about negotiating mindsets. How “open” can, should or may data be provided?<\/p>\n
Basically, three levels can be differentiated here:<\/p>\n<\/div>
- <\/i><\/span>Data can and should (also in the future) only be used for one’s own needs<\/strong>. In particular, this includes personal data – this applies against the background of the Data Protection Regulation (DS-GVO) more than ever. However, data on which business models are based can also fall into this category.<\/div><\/li>
- <\/i><\/span>Particularly against the backdrop of digital visibility, opening up data to platforms<\/strong> or making it available specifically for them can be a strategic goal. These include not only players such as Google, but also tourism-specific providers such as GetYourGuide or Outdooractive.<\/div><\/li>
- <\/i><\/span>Finally, data can be made accessible and open<\/strong> to all. Which these can exactly be depends on the individual case and is more than ever a question of strategic orientation.<\/div><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
It is therefore necessary to define on a case-by-case basis which data should be shared for which purpose. The greater goal is to offer as many stakeholders as possible the opportunity to use the information, in each case under the given framework conditions. The basic idea in tourism is that the guest should be able to find up-to-date and correct information in as many (digital) places as possible. There are two different approaches to deciding whether to open up the data.<\/p>\n<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>Open Data as an attitude.<\/span><\/h3><\/span>
Open Data as an attitude.<\/span><\/h3><\/span><\/div><\/div><\/div>The debate about Open Data is initially less about technical issues and more about negotiating mindsets. How “open” can, should or may data be provided?<\/p>\n
Basically, three levels can be differentiated here:<\/p>\n<\/div>
- <\/i><\/span>Data can and should (also in the future) only be used for one’s own needs<\/strong>. In particular, this includes personal data – this applies against the background of the Data Protection Regulation (DS-GVO) more than ever. However, data on which business models are based can also fall into this category.<\/div><\/li>
- <\/i><\/span>Particularly against the backdrop of digital visibility, opening up data to platforms<\/strong> or making it available specifically for them can be a strategic goal. These include not only players such as Google, but also tourism-specific providers such as GetYourGuide or Outdooractive.<\/div><\/li>
- <\/i><\/span>Finally, data can be made accessible and open<\/strong> to all. Which these can exactly be depends on the individual case and is more than ever a question of strategic orientation.<\/div><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
It is therefore necessary to define on a case-by-case basis which data should be shared for which purpose. The greater goal is to offer as many stakeholders as possible the opportunity to use the information, in each case under the given framework conditions. The basic idea in tourism is that the guest should be able to find up-to-date and correct information in as many (digital) places as possible. There are two different approaches to deciding whether to open up the data.<\/p>\n<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
The debate about Open Data is initially less about technical issues and more about negotiating mindsets. How “open” can, should or may data be provided?<\/p>\n
Basically, three levels can be differentiated here:<\/p>\n<\/div>
- <\/i><\/span>Data can and should (also in the future) only be used for one’s own needs<\/strong>. In particular, this includes personal data – this applies against the background of the Data Protection Regulation (DS-GVO) more than ever. However, data on which business models are based can also fall into this category.<\/div><\/li>
- <\/i><\/span>
Particularly against the backdrop of digital visibility, opening up data to platforms<\/strong> or making it available specifically for them can be a strategic goal. These include not only players such as Google, but also tourism-specific providers such as GetYourGuide or Outdooractive.<\/div><\/li>- <\/i><\/span>
Finally, data can be made accessible and open<\/strong> to all. Which these can exactly be depends on the individual case and is more than ever a question of strategic orientation.<\/div><\/li><\/ul><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>It is therefore necessary to define on a case-by-case basis which data should be shared for which purpose. The greater goal is to offer as many stakeholders as possible the opportunity to use the information, in each case under the given framework conditions. The basic idea in tourism is that the guest should be able to find up-to-date and correct information in as many (digital) places as possible. There are two different approaches to deciding whether to open up the data.<\/p>\n<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div> - <\/i><\/span>
![\"Open](\"https:\/\/open-data-germany.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Open-Data-approaches.jpg\")
<\/a><\/span><\/div>